register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
15-06-2006, 02:37 PM
Originally Posted by Clob[LIST
[*]] Luc[/LIST]kyStar
[I]No I am asking you and your friend Lou to back up your claims with the studies that I mention since it is not the dog owners on here that keep referring to 'science' but yourselves.
[/....................
No its not foolish, Wiziwig knows nothing at all about e-collars, she has no knowledge or experience except something called ‘e-collars’ exist, so she makes things up which are false and then states non factual stuff as fact, thats opposite to those who use and understand them.

The consequence is, that it is quite legitimate to ask her to support it, which she knows she cannot. At least youre last line did give me some understanding of what you mean,I thnk, so, thanks for the clarification. Oh as you can see, Minnihaha cannot scientificaly support that her dog recalls without even liver cake.
Actually sadly poor Clod, you are quite wrong, I have experience of electric collars although not on a dog. Isn't this the part where you state "name, rank and serial number?"
Lucky Star
Dogsey Veteran
Lucky Star is offline  
Location: Usually in a muddy field somewhere
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 20,145
Female 
 
15-06-2006, 02:42 PM
Originally Posted by Clob
LuckyStar
No I am asking you and your friend Lou to back up your claims with the studies that I mention since it is not the dog owners on here that keep referring to 'science' but yourselves.

Clob
WHAT STUDIES? are you talking about??

LuckyStar

There is no need for me to quote past posts since your (as in the two of you) referrals to the word 'science' has been sketchy to say the least.

Clob
There certainly is because your suggesting studies were refered to – so Page and time of [posting?

LuckyStar

Am I to conclude then that neither you nor Lou have actually carried out any proper studies? If not then I suggest it is foolish to continue to disparage other people's comments as being non-scientific.

Clob
Ah, now I do understand what you mean by the italicised part of your comment, you mean stuff written by Wiziwg (at least I think that’s what you mean).

No its not foolish, Wiziwig knows nothing at all about e-collars, she has no knowledge or experience except something called ‘e-collars’ exist, so she makes things up which are false and then states non factual stuff as fact, thats opposite to those who use and understand them.

The consequence is, that it is quite legitimate to ask her to support it, which she knows she cannot. At least youre last line did give me some understanding of what you mean,I thnk, so, thanks for the clarification. Oh as you can see, Minnihaha cannot scientificaly support that her dog recalls without even liver cake.
I am not trawling back through all these posts but, for instance, in post 183 Lou repeatedly referred to statements I made as having no scientific evidence to back them.

I have no idea what studies either of you may or may not have carried out - I did not suggest studies had been carried out but that if you/Lou insist on quoting the word science then show me your scientific proof to back up your claims which would be in the form of properly carried out studies. That is my point. You have both made a lot of claims and criticised the viewpoints of others by saying they are not scientific, suggesting yours are. If so, show me.

If you don't have any studies to back up your claims then let's drop the 'science bit', meaning your stance on e-collars is purely based on your own opinions.
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
15-06-2006, 02:46 PM
Originally Posted by Minihaha
...just so LS and I was reluctant to get involved in this thread for that reason, by perpetuating this thread we are providing the publicity craved. Certain people will attempt to keep this thread open as long as possible in order to publicize the collars. I have no desire to give extra publicity to/ encourage people to waste money on/ or worse still to do irreparable damage to their dogs by using these collars .
I agree, the voice of reason.

To be honest, if anyone is interested then they will contact unclllou and be done with it. I get bored after a while as the whole discussion ends up not being one, but just a "two man game" which I've seen before.
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
15-06-2006, 02:47 PM
Originally Posted by Lucky Star
If you don't have any studies to back up your claims then let's drop the 'science bit', meaning your stance on e-collars is purely based on your own opinions.
Good point, come on you two, show us what you've got!! Where is your science?
Lucky Star
Dogsey Veteran
Lucky Star is offline  
Location: Usually in a muddy field somewhere
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 20,145
Female 
 
15-06-2006, 02:53 PM
Originally Posted by Wysiwyg
I agree, the voice of reason.

To be honest, if anyone is interested then they will contact unclllou and be done with it. I get bored after a while as the whole discussion ends up not being one, but just a "two man game" which I've seen before.
I'm bored too! I'm going to go play with my dog now -this is becoming ridiculous.
Clob
Dogsey Junior
Clob is offline  
Location: London
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 224
Male 
 
15-06-2006, 02:54 PM
Shadow Boxer
but I wouldn't undertake to 'snake-proof' even with his written instructions - I would want him to personally guide me as it is a delicate situation and I would not wish to make even the smallest mistake.

Clod

You’re quite right, the way you describe the situation with snakes in the garden etc only someone with that special experience would be good enough to get it right. It is not an exercise which is simply correct e-collar use dependant, it needs the knowledge of the your local situation, the specific snakes, and a knowledge of e-collars use, especially their limitations in that situation.

I will teach anyone a recall using an e-collar over the phone but I would not touch anything such as you describe, I am not even sure I would try it in person as someone needs much more than knowledge of e-collar use in the situation you describe. We have nothing which could be described as a snake 'problem' here.

Another possible option might be that you went to Steve on a one off trip for an e-lesson and see how confortable you felt about it after. To be honest, although I obviously cannot understand your situation properly, but, from what you describe, I dont think I would rely on e-proofing against snakes in the garden and then leave my dogs out in the garden if I knew there was a high risk.

Proofing for snakes/a hazard whilst out for a walking is one thing but I would not rely on e-proofing to leave them safely in a garden with a high probality of snake contact being present.
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
15-06-2006, 03:06 PM
Originally Posted by uncllou
.........Actually that's EXACTLY what a dog feels, a tingling sensation, when an Ecollar is used properly. ..............

OK. I guess you could say that the dog is "annoyed" by the discomfort that the stim causes.
.......

Most people here do not "understand well Ecollars." They have huge misconceptions about what the tool is and how it's used. That's easily seen and is to be expected in a country where modern use is almost never seen.

........ But the modern version of the tool is adjustable and can be turned down so low that neither a dog nor a human can even feel it. Then it can be turned up until the dog first feels it. That's where my work is done.
.
Just musing on this again and wondering how you can actually write all this above, and yet not be initially honest and admit to using the modern electric collar on very high levels at times?

Everything you say is geared to make naive people think using the collars is not painful.
You even say that when the dog first feels the "stim" , that's when your work is done. Very misleading indeed.

You only mentioned food refusal training when the link was pointed out and proved what you do.

Dearie me
eRaze
Administrator
eRaze is offline  
Location: South Wales, UK.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 14,620
Male 
 
15-06-2006, 03:08 PM
Please do not get personal. If the thread becomes a flame war it will be closed and deleted. Ignore any personal remarks by not responding to them but report them with the report post icon instead.
Meg
Supervisor
Meg is offline  
Location: Dogsey and Worcestershire
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 49,483
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
15-06-2006, 03:13 PM
Regarding Collars , may I point out some evidence given to the House Of Commons Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Report ...

329. We received evidence representing a wide spectrum of views on the use of electronic shock and training devices. 'Animals in Mind' argued for a ban on the general use of these devices because of the dangers of misuse. It described the reactions of when shock were used on them as "violent and terrified" and claimed that many police and other working dog units had stopped using electric training "assessing that they are cruel devices".Guide Dogs for the Blind concurred with Animals in Mind that all electronic shock devices should be banned. Both Animals in Mind and the Kennel Club believed that "unwanted behavior in dogs is best discouraged by positive training methods" which are more effective and less cruel.

Opinion was divided on the appropriateness of using electronic shockcollars for the purposes of containing dogs to a particular area—effectively, as a perimeter fence, where the electric wires are buried underground. Animals in Mind argued that the use of electronic shock collars for perimeter fence purposes increased the potential for dangerous situations because dogs are likely to link the shock with the first thing they see at the time of receiving the shock, which could lead to attacks on children


333. We understand from Defra that it believes the current scientific evidence with respect to these devices to be ambiguous and therefore considers it is not in a position to prepare proposals either to regulate or ban them. Defra has told us it is considering the feasibility of undertaking a research project into the devices, as a matter of priority. If electronic shock collars and perimeter fence devices have indeed been in use in the UK for 13 years now, as one submitter claimed, then we are surprised that Defra has not yet undertaken sufficient research into these devices in order to have formed an opinion of them, particularly given the controversy surrounding their use. We urge Defra to undertake a process of consultation and research about the possible regulation of these devices as soon as possible.
the only people who submitted evidence in support of the collars were a vet a one behaviorist and even they said "a last resort method when all other methods of training a dog, including positive reinforcement, have failed. The collars were not appropriate or necessary for most dogs, or for routine obedience training; nor were they suitable or effective as a quick-fix or lazy option for people who cannot be bothered to train their pets".....

So why are two people repeatedly going on public dog forums frequented by pet owners trying to tell people these collars are a good thing. Iif they themselves are advocating the use of these collars as a last resort are pet owners the best people to be targeting ?

Hopefully on the recommendations of this select committee Defra will get it's act together and prepare a proper report and these devices will be banned once and for all.
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
15-06-2006, 03:26 PM
Yes, I read that too, also all the info and discussion on the collars. I do think in time something will be done, but not sure if it will be too late this time. I do hope not.
Closed Thread
Page 22 of 30 « First < 12 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top