register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Moobli
Dogsey Veteran
Moobli is offline  
Location: Scotland
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 19,298
Female 
 
11-05-2007, 10:38 AM
Originally Posted by megan57collies View Post
This is going over old ground Moobli, you have your view, sure but I do find it grating to those that have what you call show lines, I have New zealand lined border collies but they stem back to ISDS lines anyhow. It's the New Zealand influence that have given them there longer coats and shorter muzzles. Does that mean my dogs are ruined?
I do find it a shame and will not get involved with the argument of the ISDS and the KC. As long as the dogs are healthy and of good temperament than that is all that matters.
As you and I have discussed previously, people who love the collie breed not have the facilities to work their dogs. You are able to work yours with your other halfs sheep, which is great and I love to see your pictures. Most people don't have that luxery and have to find other outlets for their collies.
I respect you sit on the fence of the ISDS as you work your dogs cos that's the main view. But without actually researching the show lines and where most of them come to say they are ruined is sweeping and untrue.
Yes I agree there are dogs that would not do the job, but turning it on it's head and you would know. Not every collie bred for working is capable of doing the job either by lack of instinct or poor temperament.
I think it's sad if you love a breed, then love all of it. I run my dogs with ISDS lines and not person has made comments regarding with registration or his pedigree.
It may be old ground, but I do think it is relevant to the discussion.

Border collies bred from anything other than working dogs IMO will become diluted over time. Yes, show dog lines do go back to ISDS lines, but how many generations back? How many generations does it take to dilute the work ethic so much that it no longer exists? I will have to try and find the piece I read that suggested within 3 generations or less.

I love border collies, as do you, but as such shouldn't we, as collie lovers, be trying to preserve the breed? ie. Preserve the "true" border collie as a working dog. I think agility, flyball etc is good for a collie that has no outlet for working sheep. I don't just train my dogs on OH's sheep, but I also pay for weekly lessons. OK, not all collie owners have this luxury, or indeed are even interested in working their dogs, but the traits that make the collie such a good working dog, also make it a great agility, flyball, working trials dog, and also a great pet for an energetic family who understand its needs. It is not that I don't like KC registered collies, I like all dogs ... but I just wish the breeders of KC lines would be more interested in working ability and less interested in long coats and teddybear faces.

I have said somewhere else (possibly another thread) where not all working bred collies are suitable for working homes, and therefore these dogs may make ideal pets for the right family.
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
11-05-2007, 10:51 AM
I also love collies very much, especially mine.
I can only say here, that sometimes, preserving the work ethic of a breed, has to stop (I'm not saying that is the case with collies,) but people still want to continue the breed..is that wrong? Coming from strong working lines nowadays is only important if you want to work the dog?
Reply With Quote
spot
Dogsey Veteran
spot is offline  
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,724
 
11-05-2007, 10:55 AM
Originally Posted by Ramble View Post
Spot, 2 different lines of discussion.
If pet owners want to breed the odd litter, because they know there is a demand for said pups, as people have asked them to breed...wheres the problem? They know the pups will go to good homes and that there is actually a good home waiting for them. Better than having to advertise. As long as they are a of sound health and temeperament, checks done etc.

The other discussion on here is crosses...as I said why not? You didn't answer about Guide Dogs stopping crossing as it was impractical?
But how do you know what the pups are going to be like once you’ve produced this mixed litter? What if those good homes who said oh your dogs so cute I’d love a puppy suddenly decide well they don’t look like I thought so no thanks. Again it’s a difference of opinions of what is ethical breeding and anyone who has to advertise a litter is not ethical IMO (again only my opinion)!

Ive been asked time and again for one of mine to cover bitches one because is really is an extremely good looking dog but also could work, but would I? No why on earth should I stud my dog just because someone wants a puppy? One of my girls has excellent pedigree and could of produce some winning pups but again why should I put her through that just so someone can make some money of them? (No chance of either happening as all my dogs are done). Again to me my dogs are far more important to me than someone who might like a puppy from them but again that’s just me!

Again IMO to breed just because someone has said they want one of you of your puppies to me is not a good enough reason, neither is ‘interest’ it seems to me that to breed just because there’s interest in your pups is doing it to make money, why would you put a bitch through? Or did you mean interest in watching a bitch go through the experience?

The Guide dog assoc that started the practise gave it up as it didn’t work others as has been said do sometimes cross but again not for commercial gain but to try to achieve a betterment of the lives of blind people. Ive yet to understand the point of puggles?

Obviously it comes down to differences of opinions but to me if I have a pet dog thats what it is, its not a puppy machine or money making venture its part of my family, its not there to satisfy other peoples need for a puppy its there for me to love, protect and enjoy.
Reply With Quote
davidmh
Dogsey Junior
davidmh is offline  
Location: Berkshire, UK
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 24
Male 
 
11-05-2007, 10:56 AM
My answer to the original thread TITLE is yes.

Bearing in mind that the majority of dogs are owned purely as pets, whether mongrel or pedigree, the key things needed are health, temperament and trainability and that is where they need to be proven.

I suppose that if you are either breeding or purchasing with a view to showing or working, there is more credibility if there is a track record of success in working or showing and that whatever standards which are appropriate are met.

However there is no guarantee that because its sire was a champ that junior will be, so any pups saleability will revert back to the key things of health, temperament and trainability.
Reply With Quote
Moobli
Dogsey Veteran
Moobli is offline  
Location: Scotland
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 19,298
Female 
 
11-05-2007, 10:59 AM
Originally Posted by megan57collies View Post
Bear in mind also, it's not the KC that come up with the breed standards, it's in fact the club or breed councils made up or people in the breed for many years and that includes breeders of working lines.
Does it??? Obviously I cannot speak for all farmers or shepherds but the ones I know are all members of the International Sheep Dog Society not the Border Collie Club of GB.
Reply With Quote
Moobli
Dogsey Veteran
Moobli is offline  
Location: Scotland
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 19,298
Female 
 
11-05-2007, 11:03 AM
Originally Posted by Ramble View Post
I also love collies very much, especially mine.
I can only say here, that sometimes, preserving the work ethic of a breed, has to stop (I'm not saying that is the case with collies,) but people still want to continue the breed..is that wrong? Coming from strong working lines nowadays is only important if you want to work the dog?
I have to strongly disagree with this where border collies are concerned. I won't discuss other breeds that are not my chosen breed.

The working side of the collie is what MAKES the collie IMO. The border collie is the premier herding dog in the UK and abroad - why on earth would breeders want to stop producing working dogs?

A working collie's inherited traits are also what make this breed excellent at agility, flyball, working trials, search and rescue etc etc etc.

I think the problem is that too many people like the look of the collie, or have heard it is easy to train, and go out and buy a cute puppy without any thought to what these dogs are bred to do. Madness!
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
11-05-2007, 11:06 AM
Originally Posted by spot View Post
But how do you know what the pups are going to be like once you’ve produced this mixed litter? What if those good homes who said oh your dogs so cute I’d love a puppy suddenly decide well they don’t look like I thought so no thanks. Again it’s a difference of opinions of what is ethical breeding and anyone who has to advertise a litter is not ethical IMO (again only my opinion)!
People can change their mind about a show line pup or a working bred pup as well though.More unlikely to do so if it is a friend of the owner...
Ive been asked time and again for one of mine to cover bitches one because is really is an extremely good looking dog but also could work, but would I? No why on earth should I stud my dog just because someone wants a puppy? One of my girls has excellent pedigree and could of produce some winning pups but again why should I put her through that just so someone can make some money of them? (No chance of either happening as all my dogs are done). Again to me my dogs are far more important to me than someone who might like a puppy from them but again that’s just me!
But if you don't want a litter and don't want to do that, which is fine, I wouldn't want to either, then that's just you. Other people with a bitch may want to, all I am saying is that if they tick all the boxes health and temperament wise, why not. I am not saying people should just do it because someone wants a pup, Mahooli asked why do it and I listed a number of reasons that are not all mututally exclusive.
Again IMO to breed just because someone has said they want one of you of your puppies to me is not a good enough reason, neither is ‘interest’ it seems to me that to breed just because there’s interest in your pups is doing it to make money, why would you put a bitch through? Or did you mean interest in watching a bitch go through the experience?
The interest was in rearing a litter of pups. Some people would like to do that, again if all the health checks etc are in place and they have good homes for the pups and are behaving in a reputable manner...why not?

The Guide dog assoc that started the practise gave it up as it didn’t work others as has been said do sometimes cross but again not for commercial gain but to try to achieve a betterment of the lives of blind people. Ive yet to understand the point of puggles?
They cross more than 'sometimes'.
No, it's not for commercial gain, but it is to provide healthy well socialised dogs that are friendly to both people and other dogs and are happy in any situation that they are put into.
Why oh why is it wrong for other people to try to breed the same?
Obviously it comes down to differences of opinions but to me if I have a pet dog thats what it is, its not a puppy machine or money making venture its part of my family, its not there to satisfy other peoples need for a puppy its there for me to love, protect and enjoy.

Yep, me too, but if people want to bred their pet under the circumstances I've outlined countless times on this thread now ...why not?????
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
11-05-2007, 11:09 AM
Originally Posted by Moobli View Post
I have to strongly disagree with this where border collies are concerned. I won't discuss other breeds that are not my chosen breed.

The working side of the collie is what MAKES the collie IMO. The border collie is the premier herding dog in the UK and abroad - why on earth would breeders want to stop producing working dogs?

A working collie's inherited traits are also what make this breed excellent at agility, flyball, working trials, search and rescue etc etc etc.

I think the problem is that too many people like the look of the collie, or have heard it is easy to train, and go out and buy a cute puppy without any thought to what these dogs are bred to do. Madness!
Breeders would stop producing working dogs as there is no demand for them outside of a working environment.
The traits you have mentioned would not necessarily be lost. Just to qualify when I talk about the working aspect and working collies, I am talking about ones that have been bred to herd for generations, they do not necessarily fit well into family life, BUT collies have other things going for them that make them perfect for life in a busy family environment...
Reply With Quote
megan57collies
Dogsey Veteran
megan57collies is offline  
Location: Rugby, UK
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,179
Female 
 
11-05-2007, 11:09 AM
Originally Posted by Moobli View Post
It may be old ground, but I do think it is relevant to the discussion.

Border collies bred from anything other than working dogs IMO will become diluted over time. Yes, show dog lines do go back to ISDS lines, but how many generations back? How many generations does it take to dilute the work ethic so much that it no longer exists? I will have to try and find the piece I read that suggested within 3 generations or less.

I love border collies, as do you, but as such shouldn't we, as collie lovers, be trying to preserve the breed? ie. Preserve the "true" border collie as a working dog. I think agility, flyball etc is good for a collie that has no outlet for working sheep. I don't just train my dogs on OH's sheep, but I also pay for weekly lessons. OK, not all collie owners have this luxury, or indeed are even interested in working their dogs, but the traits that make the collie such a good working dog, also make it a great agility, flyball, working trials dog, and also a great pet for an energetic family who understand its needs. It is not that I don't like KC registered collies, I like all dogs ... but I just wish the breeders of KC lines would be more interested in working ability and less interested in long coats and teddybear faces.

I have said somewhere else (possibly another thread) where not all working bred collies are suitable for working homes, and therefore these dogs may make ideal pets for the right family.
Moobli
I'm going to save this discussion for another time between you and me as you know I respect you and enjoy talking to you. At the end of the day though, neither of us have bred dogs so have actually not contributed anything to the breed in the lines anyhow. Comments on the show line as you call it do get my back up as with respect as you have said before you have no interest in the show dogs and do not know their pedigree or history behind them. Your opinion has it's place, just as mine does but it does annoy me with comments of fluffy teddy bears. What's the coat got to do with whether they work or not.
My boy is one of these, did very well on the working instinct tests by the way, and he has over 30 years of careful breeding which has resulted in excellent health, hipscores, and temperament. Now you know as I do that most of the working collies that shepherds for everyday work do not actually go through the health and hip scoring checks. They work there dogs and that's it. I'm not talking registered ISDS or KC registered. I'm talking the day to day farmer that just breeds to get that next working pup to bring on. You know how it works, a working dog works on it's reputation within an area a lot of the time with in the farming community without ever doing a working competition.
I think a breed is ruined when they are mucked around with so much that they can't naturally give birth or their mouths are shot to bits because of human intervention. To me the border collie has been adapted to fit in with peoples lifestyles.
Some may say that if you don't work a border collie you shouldn't have one. I have friends even of this opinion.
My opinion is that as long as the dog is mentally stimulated enough, happy and of sound temperament (which many are not in the breed) then there's room for everyone.
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
11-05-2007, 11:13 AM
Right guys it's time for me to bow out of this one as I don't really want to get involved in the BC debate as better people than me have argued it into the ground and still not settled it!

All I want to do now is to reiterate.
IF a dog has ALL available health checks (I would include a medical from a vet in that) IF it has a great temperament, IF the breeder is willing to take on after care advice etc for the new owners, IF they have good homes lined up...I see no reason why a pet owner shouldn't breedthe occassional litter for the pet market.
That doesn't stop working lines still being bred or showing lines still being bred, nor IMO does it make the breeder a puppy farmer.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 13 of 54 « First < 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 23 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top