register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
17-03-2008, 03:46 PM
Originally Posted by horses01466 View Post
I rate him 10 out of 10
What is it, bout boxers having to have loads of white on them,
esp, when it says that they should be predominantly a solid colour
Sorry. no offence to those with lots of white, but I prefer the boxer which is more one colour, just because I see boxers as guard dogs, and whitey dogs look to pretty to me, not what the boxer was intended to look like, I thought they were suppose to intimidate an intrudor
Does any one agree??
Boxers where not bred to intimidate anyone, they are more likely to let any intruder in the house and lick them to death.


As for him being "solid" nothing wrong with that a Boxer is a Boxer no matter the colour....but in the show ring "flashy " is prefered....yes they do solid classes, but not many these days.

There was solid bitch showing last yr, she was lovely and a few judges did place her.

But the fact is, being "solid" is going to hinder him in the ring, there is no getting way from that fact.

Have a good look at some results, go to some show kennels web pages, you will find they are flashy either Red or Brindle

Now on the Continent , you will see things differently.

If you want to have a go , go for it, you will find it fun.
Reply With Quote
IsoChick
Dogsey Veteran
IsoChick is offline  
Location: Preesall, Lancashire
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,622
Female 
 
17-03-2008, 03:51 PM
Woud he be classed as "solid" then despite his white bib (and a couple of toes) ?

Does that mean Max is "solid" too?
Reply With Quote
horses01466
Dogsey Senior
horses01466 is offline  
Location: uk scotland
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 348
Female 
 
17-03-2008, 03:51 PM
I think you will find they are said to guard???????????
Reply With Quote
horses01466
Dogsey Senior
horses01466 is offline  
Location: uk scotland
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 348
Female 
 
17-03-2008, 03:52 PM
And why, do they have to be coloured??????????????
Reply With Quote
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
17-03-2008, 03:53 PM
Originally Posted by IsoChick View Post
Woud he be classed as "solid" then despite his white bib (and a couple of toes) ?

Does that mean Max is "solid" too?
Yes he would be classed as solid!!
Reply With Quote
zoeybeau1
Dogsey Veteran
zoeybeau1 is offline  
Location: N.I
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,832
Female 
 
17-03-2008, 03:57 PM
Originally Posted by horses01466 View Post
I rate him 10 out of 10
What is it, bout boxers having to have loads of white on them,
esp, when it says that they should be predominantly a solid colour
Sorry. no offence to those with lots of white, but I prefer the boxer which is more one colour, just because I see boxers as guard dogs, and whitey dogs look to pretty to me, not what the boxer was intended to look like, I thought they were suppose to intimidate an intrudor
Does any one agree??
No Sonya I wouldn't want mine to look mean, although lot's of people would chose solid colour over flashy one's but I thought that it comes down to personal prefrence, Max and Murphy are lovely dog's and if a judge chooses a dog only because of it's colour then imo they shouldnt be judging.
esp if it comes down to the solid dog having better confirmation that the flashy one.
Reply With Quote
dollyknockers
Dogsey Veteran
dollyknockers is offline  
Location: With the fairies in the garden
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,519
Female 
 
17-03-2008, 03:58 PM
Originally Posted by IsoChick View Post
Woud he be classed as "solid" then despite his white bib (and a couple of toes) ?

Does that mean Max is "solid" too?
Yes he would be regarded as solid ,As his white markings are not extensive enough to be classsed as flashy xxdk
Reply With Quote
zoeybeau1
Dogsey Veteran
zoeybeau1 is offline  
Location: N.I
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,832
Female 
 
17-03-2008, 03:58 PM
Originally Posted by horses01466 View Post
And why, do they have to be coloured??????????????
They don't have to be coloured it's down to prefrence, but the American dog's are more colourd and alot of dog's were imported for there colour and I think alot of breeder's found they sold better.
Reply With Quote
IsoChick
Dogsey Veteran
IsoChick is offline  
Location: Preesall, Lancashire
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,622
Female 
 
17-03-2008, 03:59 PM
Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
Yes he would be classed as solid!!
Their sire's kennels have a lot of dark brindle dogs/bitches, with a larger white bib and white paws, which isn't as flashy as I'd expect, although there's a lovely bitch with a white band across her nose...

And, oh dear, they're planning a litter in 18 months (must stay away from webpage....)
Reply With Quote
dollyknockers
Dogsey Veteran
dollyknockers is offline  
Location: With the fairies in the garden
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,519
Female 
 
17-03-2008, 04:01 PM
Originally Posted by horses01466 View Post
And why, do they have to be coloured??????????????
I dont think its a matter of them having to be coloured , It more of a case of personal preferrence , I own both flashy and solid , But I neither prefer one over the other , I also find most white boxers very desirable , With me its personal preference xxdk
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top