|
Location: Co. Durham, UK
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,213
|
|
Originally Posted by
magpye
Thanks for the responses
I can now answer my lodger's question. Makes sense, so we should gradually see fewer docked dogs in the next few years and then eventually all show ring dogs will have lovely full tails
I do know a few dogs that have had tO have their tails docked after damaging them doing their jibs running through underbrush etc, but then I know a few people who have trapped their thumbs in desks while filing in office jobs, sitlk I don't think all office workers should have thier thumbs docked!
Lovely full tails???? I tell you what, the next time Oscar my full tailed Wire Vizsla is
screaming in agony because he's ended up with dead tail after a spell hunting for game I'll give you a ring so you can come and view his "lovely full tail". Doesn't matter that the dog can hardly walk without screaming (and I mean screaming, my parents nearly rang the vets the first time they witnessed it as they thought he was paralysed
), as long as it looks nice, right? And you think those who dock are cruel. Unbelievable.
Originally Posted by
smokeybear
But why and how are so many of the gundogs in crufts today docked when I thought the practice was being frowned on in showing circles and is certainly illegal in this country?
Not read the whole thread but to answer your questions:
It is NOT frowned upon in showing circles
It is NOT illegal in this country for certain breeds eg spaniels, HPRs and terriers IF certain criteria are met in order for them to work.
What is UNFAIR is that dogs which are dual purpose eg meet the kennel club standard in both physique AND working ability, are DENIED the ability to be shown at Crufts IF they have been docked post the docking laws.
This will inevitably mean that HPRs go the way that spaneils and Labs have gone, a show side and a working line.
If you think it is cruel, you do not have to support this, but it is much more cruel to have a dog with long standing and often incurable injuries sustained by a dog that is working and have to have the tail docked often more than once as an adult.
Totally agree with this. I don't agree with docking for cosmetic purposes, but docking for working purposes, to prevent horrific injuries is necessary. To ban legally docked, fit for function gundogs from the show ring (when the KC bang on about dogs being fit for function) is absurd imo.
Originally Posted by
labradork
You would be very surprised how often breeds like Spaniels and the lightly coated HPR breeds (who, when left undocked, have long whip like tails) endure injury to undocked tails when working.
It is also a myth that a dog cannot communicate with a docked tail. My dog dogs docked tail is just as expressive as a full one, whether it be wagging a mile a minute, tucked in because she is scared, etc. Besides, there is FAR more to communication than just a tail. Also, is there any actual evidence that tail docking is detrimental to the balance of a dog? given the number of Spaniel and HPR breeds that are versatile in all kinds of working roles, I don't believe for a minute their 'balance' has been affected by being docked.
If done correctly following proper procedures, docking is NOT cruel to the dog. There is a difference between a person perceiving something to be cruel, and it ACTUALLY being cruel and detrimental to the life of the animal. If you want to talk about cruel, what about the breeding of dogs who can't breath properly? or the breeding of dogs with physical and structural deformities? or the breeding of some breeds who are so riddled with genetic health problems that they are lucky to make past the age of 7 or 8? now THAT is cruel.
Tried to rep you for this but it wouldn't let me. Very good post!
Originally Posted by
ClaireandDaisy
Maybe I`ve only seen Brittanys with tails?
Or maybe it`s that I`m less used to seeing docked dogs. The bobtail just looked weird to me. How does it affect balance, I wonder.
Well given that the Brittany that won BOB is a Full Champion (having won a CoM at a Field Trial) I'd hazard a guess and say it can balance pretty well!
Originally Posted by
aerolor
Agree totally Magpie - Flatcoated Retrievers are never docked. They can, and do, work the same sort of country as springers and their tails are just as active - granted they are a bit taller, but thats all. There is not much to make docking a dog valid, imo.
Flat Coats are retrievers, Springers are hunters bred to work in thick cover - two totally different jobs hence why one is docked and the other not!
Originally Posted by
ClaireandDaisy
Why do English pointers have tails when German Pointers are docked?
English Pointers are bred to point Grouse on the moors, working in heather doesn't produce tail injuries. GSPs are bred to hunt, point and retrieve and used for rough shooting in thick cover which often produces tail injuries. If this difference isn't evidence for the logical need for tail docking in certain breeds then I don't know what is! If we were all mutilating maniacs then every hunting or pointing breed would be docked, rather than those who actually needed it!