register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
sallyinlancs
Dogsey Senior
sallyinlancs is offline  
Location: n/a
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 912
Female 
 
23-06-2008, 11:26 AM
It's a good point nickyboy. Perhaps you should at least have to pass some sort of test in which you can demonstrate that you know how to use one properly - and possibly have to gain a licence?
Reply With Quote
ClaireandDaisy
Dogsey Veteran
ClaireandDaisy is offline  
Location: Essex, UK
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,147
Female 
 
23-06-2008, 11:26 AM
Originally Posted by nickyboy View Post
I watched a CM episode where he used it to stop a cattle dog attacking tyres on tractors and combines, the owners had used it previously to no avail and were told it was about the timing of the correction. ........Were there alternatives to discourage the dogs actions that were workable over the sound of the machinery?
I have retrained a dog who attacked bike wheels and joggers. It wasn`t particularly difficult but it did take more than two training sessions. So the answer to your question is - yes there are alternatives. Not quick-fixes perhaps, but the methods used before this vile invention was manufactured.

A licence to inflict pain - an interesting proposition
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
23-06-2008, 11:28 AM
Originally Posted by ClaireandDaisy View Post
This is illogical IMO as a whistle is trained positively - provoking an almost pavlovian response in the dog who is habituated with food rewards to take notice of the whistle while the electic shock collar uses aversive conditioning through pain. You may prefer not to recognise pain in your dog, but it doesn`t affect how the animal feels.
I think proper training using positive methods is preferable to never being allowed off-lead.
Having whistled trained a pretty decent recall in a number of dogs now, I have to agree with Claireand Daisy on this one. The whistle is used with rewards and that's what the dog asociates it with. An 'e' collar uses a shock, no matter how the language is altered to make it sound more accpetable, it uses a shock and it makes the dog stop because it hurts the dog. It cannot be compared to whistle training which is reward based, as it is an aversive. Totally different training method and as Claire has already said in a previous post, it hurts...it wouldn't work if it didn't.
Reply With Quote
sallyinlancs
Dogsey Senior
sallyinlancs is offline  
Location: n/a
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 912
Female 
 
23-06-2008, 11:30 AM
I think proper training using positive methods is preferable to never being allowed off-lead.
If a dog's behaviour is putting his own life in danger, I think positive methods may not have the urgency required to correct the unwanted behaviour quickly enough.

ClaireandDaisy how would YOU have handled the cattle dog that Nickyboy mentioned?
Reply With Quote
sallyinlancs
Dogsey Senior
sallyinlancs is offline  
Location: n/a
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 912
Female 
 
23-06-2008, 11:32 AM
I agree it is an aversive rather than a positive method. However, it's possible to be shocked without being hurt.
Reply With Quote
nickyboy
Dogsey Senior
nickyboy is offline  
Location: kent, uk
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 487
Male 
 
23-06-2008, 11:33 AM
Originally Posted by ClaireandDaisy View Post
I have retrained a dog who attacked bike wheels and joggers. It wasn`t particularly difficult but it did take more than two training sessions. So the answer to your question is - yes there are alternatives. Not quick-fixes perhaps, but the methods used before this vile invention was manufactured.

A licence to inflict pain - an interesting proposition
I think if there are other ways they should definately be used, I wasnt condoning them nor comdemning - if whistles worked from distance over the droning sounds from a combine harvester then yeah of course they should be used - i can only imagine that it other methods had failed by then...
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
23-06-2008, 11:34 AM
Originally Posted by sallyinlancs View Post
I agree it is an aversive rather than a positive method. However, it's possible to be shocked without being hurt.
But it was you that compared it to a whistle...

I'm not sure I see your logic.
You put a shock collar around a dog's neck and press the button...how does it not hurt (and yes I've felt it before the thread goes that way...)
Reply With Quote
sallyinlancs
Dogsey Senior
sallyinlancs is offline  
Location: n/a
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 912
Female 
 
23-06-2008, 11:36 AM
If it hurt you, it must have been on too high a setting for your neck.
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
23-06-2008, 11:38 AM
Originally Posted by sallyinlancs View Post
If it hurt you, it must have been on too high a setting for your neck.

Perhaps I like pain...

it wasn't on my neck or on a high setting. I have a high pain threshold, just for the record...
Reply With Quote
sallyinlancs
Dogsey Senior
sallyinlancs is offline  
Location: n/a
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 912
Female 
 
23-06-2008, 11:39 AM
But it was you that compared it to a whistle...

I'm not sure I see your logic.
Sorry Ramble, I thought the suggestion of using a whistle was meant as in sound aversion, as with a rattle bottle and not as it is used for recall etc. with positive reinforcement.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 20 of 64 « First < 10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 30 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top