I haven't read that anywhere, so it's hard to know what to think, because all news reports write different things.

I still don't agree with shooting to kill, sorry.

I would like a truthful news report, that is the same as all other news reports, and tells the country what we have a right to know.

but ask yourself would you want to question a man strapped with explosives ????? cos i wouldn't

am sure more will come through during the day

Sorry Hevvur, I should have said it's on the ITV News on TV at the moment.

But what if it turns out he DIDN'T have any explosives?
No apologies would be made.
I am not defending the guy at all, or anyone else.
They always go on about being innocent until proven guilty though.
Shoot them with a strong tranquliser or something! I know people don't agree with me, but I just can't agree with shooting to kill, with no proof. sorry
If they had proof/sightings, then fair enough, but the publis should be told this. Not just reports saying a 'suspected' suicide bomber.


EDIT: Ahh, thanks Lucky Star

do see what you mean hevver............ i would imagine there was good reason for suspicion

Just turned the TV on to see if I can catch anything, and I can't even receive ITV for some reason!

They're all good points, Hevvur and probably reflect what the whole country will think - should they or shouldn't they?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4706913.stm

This is what makes me wonder you see. What if he wasn't a bomber.

sky news have just said he was one seen on CCTV fleeing the underground yesterday when stopped by plain clothed officers he gave chase to the underground tube train ...the police had to make an instant decision