|
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,558
|
|
Originally Posted by
surannon
A reputable breeder/exhibitor will try and get as many puppies as possible into the ring (as long as they're good enough) as they'll be justly proud of what they've bred.
Debs
Crikey, can't agree with this!
Yes I do know of some breeders who give priority to show homes. These are the most competitive ones who chase points for the numerous trophies and competitions run by breed clubs and pet food manufacturers. Often they accumulate points just by sheer volume of entries.
Reputable show breeders that I personally have most respect for, assess potential puppy owners on their personal circumstances, experience, ethics etc etc. Intention to show comes way down the list and is often a put-off in my experience.
Originally Posted by
surannon
If it fitted the breed standard what would make it unshowable?
Sorry, I missed this yesterday.
If you look back through the history of breeds, you will see how drastically many of them have changed in appearance. The modern day show Beardie, I have already mentioned, has a totally different coat to its ancestors. Haven't said they are "unshowable" but you wouldn't get very far showing one of these 'working type' Beardies these days.
The example most often given, of a breed that the showring has changed into a caricature, is the GSD. Take a look here. This is not an anti GSD showing site and it doesn't show the most extreme examples of dogs that win in modern times -
http://www.aniwa.com/en/chien/Grand_...to=0/index.htm
Other breeds that have changed considerably are the Spaniels.....Cockers, look for the 'of Ware' dogs of just a few decades ago. also Clumbers and ESSs. Many other breeds have health problems because of these changes, like Bloodhounds and Bulldogs. Standards may have changed slightly through the decades, but not so much that could be responsible for the change in the dogs. A dog that looked like the ancestors of these breeds would be laughed out of the ring these days.
I'm sure that the writers of the original standards had no idea how much impact the showring would have on their breeds. If they had, they may have been more specific in defining features. After all, what does 'good angulation' mean..... good compared to what?
It's a legacy of our own human ancestry to notice and focus on anything that appears different from the norm. As predators, this is how the early humans hunted sucessfully, by marking the injured or old deer in the herd. We now apply this to our domestic animals albeit in a different way. We favour the one that stands out in a crowd. How often have you seen this in critiques! This had led to more and more exaggeration slowly creeping in.