|
Location: leicester uk
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,407
|
|
The latesyt from Many Tears Rescue:
10-3-10 update from Bill
We are still waiting for the results of the police investigation into the shooting of the 10 GSD's in Wales last summer (not that anyone really expects much to come from it), but in the meantime we are still spreading the word, collecting letters from various Vet practices around the country, and of course we are still collecting signatures on the petition. One of the most disturbing things that has come out of this entire thing for me is the blind trust that people seem to have for this group that is still allowed to shoot dogs with a bolt gun and then ram a rod into the hole to kill them, all in the name of animal rescue and welfare. People still do not beleive that they are even capable of shooting dogs in the first place, others want to defend them as they are the experts and therefore they know best. Still others keep asking- but what about a roadside accident where the animal is needing to be put to sleep as it is suffering so? Below is the response that someone received from their MP recently when questioning captive bolt shooting.
Thank you. It sounds horrible but I have no way of telling if an animal suffers more than if it is destroyed using other means. The RSPCA are the experts and I do not doubt that they have animal welfare at heart. I’m sorry but I’m struggling a bit with this as my squeamishness and natural inclination to question the practice may in fact be counterproductive if it actually resulted in more suffering rather than less.
This is my reply:
1. You call the RSPCA experts, but who has labeled them as experts? - I would argue that they have done so themselves- They wear uniforms and certainly appear and act like experts but an RSPCA inspector has no more official authority then you or I do- they do not have the powers of entry like the police or the local authority animal welfare people- they cannot cite you or fine you. Most importantly, they are not recognized by the courts as expert witnesses to the extent that if an animal is found to be suffering and they want to prosecute, they have to call in a Vet as an expert witness as their own inspectors are not considered trained or expert enough to secure a prosecution by themselves. They may appear to be experts, especially through their own media and PR departments, but I would rather have those who are fully trained and certified such as a Veterinary Surgeon making the decision to kill my pet dog.
2. If your old or sick dog needs to be euthanized as a Vet has determined that it is suffering and putting to sleep is the kindest thing- they do not pole the dog out of their office and shoot it in the head with a bolt gun then ram a rod through it's brain. Even if the dog is aggressive they do not do this- if it is indeed such a quick, kind, and acceptable way to euthanize a dog, then why do vets not do it?
3. A Captive Bolt Gun is a slaughterers stunning weapon. It is used in the food animal slaughter process, or for emergency slaughter (ie - farm animals for a mass culling because of disease- or for a severely injured and suffering animal from an accident or trauma) We are not debating it's use on such animals, but rather on companion animals. These animals were not bred and raised for slaughter, but as pets. In the slaughter industry there have been numerous studies as well as undercover expose's showing that mis-stunning regularly occurs. This, by personnel who do it all day long every day. By virtue of sheer numbers, they would certainly be considered more experienced then an RSPCA inspector, and they do not get it right - so why are we supposed to believe that an R$PCA inspector who does not do it all day every day would get it more right then the slaughter men? Is it just because they are telling us so that I am suppose to beleive them?
4. You state that "The RSPCA are the experts and I do not doubt that they have animal welfare at heart." I say- Did these experts have animal welfare at heart when they shot the 10 German Shepherd Dogs last June? I think not- Did they even try to remove the dogs to a rescue centre and assess them- NO !!!!!!!!! Did they have a Veterinarian examine the dogs to determine if they were suffering and needed to be put to sleep- NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5. The RSPCA inspectors are not answerable or accountable to anyone but themselves. Even the police have to answer for their actions, but the RSPCA can make it's own rules and does not have to account to anyone. The RSPCA first denied they use this method and then only admitted it when caught out. Now they say they need to use it and cite roadside accident animals as the prime example. They say they only put an animal down to stop it from suffering.
Fact- THE GERMAN SHEPHERDS WERE NOT INJURED AND SUFFERING.
Fact- THEY LIED ABOUT IT , THEN WHEN CAUGHT, CHANGED THEIR STORY.
Fact- THEY HAVE SINCE CENSORED THE NEWS OF THIS INCIDENT EVERY WAY THEY CAN.
They are funded by the public who are largely unaware of this practice and they do not admit to it and do not want it known.
Fact- Killing an animal with a bolt gun and rod is much cheaper then injecting it.
Fact- Currently they can kill an animal this way without ever consulting a Veterinarian.
Fact- Their story does not add up
Fact- I would trust a Veterinary Surgeon to put one of my dogs to sleep rather then one of these "experts".
I feel that these "experts that have animal welfare at heart" have been less then honest and have proven to me that they are not worthy of my blind trust in some of their animal welfare actions. Those 10 german Shepherds were slaughtered because nobody questioned this practice, so I will continue to question this practice until I know that the "experts" are no longer needlesly slaughtering dogs with bolt guns.
Sylvia actually called the R$PCA last month and tried to speak with Timm Wass himself. She could not get through to him, but left a message with his secratary saying that she felt bad that the local branches were possibly getting negative feedback and wanted to discuss the matter, but he has never even returned her call. That seems to be the way it is with them- their way or no way at all. Dog's Today will be running an article on the subject in their April issue, perhaps that will bring this whole situation back into the public light and we can finally see some changes.