|
Location: middlesbrough uk
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 431
|
|
Originally Posted by
Jackbox
I agree with you on an ethical vet will never put a dog down for no reason, but cant see why he should only be classed ethical if they use complementary therapy. if I have a sick animal I want the most effective treatment for my dog, I dont care how many greyhounds or other animals he has used in his training to gain the skills he has, and my guess is neither would you if the chips where down.
Well I do care how many healthy animals are used for a vet to gain his training skills which is why I would use alternative therapies as a first option.
So here's a thought for you, your dog needs specialized treatment, the vet that is recommended for the job, he is the best in his field, but you find out one day he was at some point in his earlier career, was what you hate, he has been involved in research on the greyhounds injuries, and this is how he has gained such expertise , does your dog who needs his skills, pay the price for your convictions, or do you allow said vet to treat your dog????
As I have said - I would use what I consider to be an ethical vet who is trained in complimentary therapies.
Racing injuries will be akin to the sprinter (human) , doing damage to his muscle/tendons, the surgeon doing the "fixing" will have done his research on the human body, he does not need to be specific to "sprinters".
Human bodies will have been alive not destroyed for economic purposes - so your analogy is poor to say the least.
Hence , my point, a greyhound used in research, will benifit ALL dogs, even maybe one of your own one day.
The research at Liverpool uni was specific to racing injuries - just how many times do I have to say that before you grasp it. Read the letter........
http://s428.photobucket.com/albums/q...ent=LU3006.jpg
A vet needs to "practice and have an understanding of the dogs anatomy , bone structure , muscles and tendons , not to mention organs.. they cant do so , unless they have "guinea pigs" to practice on.
So it is irrelevant , for what ever the reasons behind the dissection, the vet learns, and you are the recipient of his experience!! or your dogs are.[/COLOR]
Your principles seem to be, you protest about the way the expertise is got, but are willing to accept it when needed!.
Not in the least - read my reply above. Again you assume wrongly.
My farrier, used to practice and conduct his reseach on th eleg/hoof of a horse, most were racehorses, I was very grateful he learnt his expertise to treat my horses feet when needed.. where and on what he learnt it, did not matter to me.
As long as said animals are euthanised humainly, thats all that counts.
Which clearly shows you show no compassion or respect for animals, as long as those which you consider as your possessions are healthy - how sad