|
Location: Co. Durham, UK
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,213
|
|
Originally Posted by
random
You will soon find out if he's show quality according to the judges when he's around 6 months.
Indeed!
Originally Posted by
jones
Did the breeder reduce the price of the dog, because when my OH brought a Lab on 'just a pet' purpose, he paid a lot lower price for her, and she wasn't KC registered but the breeder did show all the paperwork of the dam and sire with the registration of the litter with KC...
Did the breeder say that they were reducing the sale price for the dog, due to it's 'pet only' status? As I could see wh the are reluctant to give permission to show the dog, feeling that they had been conned into selling one of there litter under pertences...
If this has happened perhaps offering the make-up cost of the dog might change there minds?
But I would have a word with the kennel club, as they might be able to say, whether the sales slip could be considered a true contract enforcable by law or not
No they paid £600 for him, same as all the other pups in the litter. The price was advertised on CD.
Originally Posted by
bugzy
The kennel club will NOT do anything if you decided to show. There is no restictions on KC papers saying you can/cannot show a dog.
I really dont get the breeder though, Surely if the pup goes to ringcraft, learns to show and is a good example of the breed then any breeder worth their salt would be proud of their dogs babes being shown.
What Dawn said earlier in the thread is right though... If your parents are worried about the breeder trying to inforce the contract ( more chance of plating fog, or being bit by a daffodil than a judge siding with the breeder) then transfer the kc ownership into your name... once a transfer is done, you as the owner have no contract with the original breeder at all
I was thinking about this the other night and I thought what about just registering him in my Dad's name when his papers come through as it's only my Mother that has signed the sales receipt?
Originally Posted by
Mahooli
It will be the breeders responsibility to take your parents to court to test their contract on the no show aspect and most breeders simply wouldn't do it. However, if he is a successful show dog and someone wants to use him for breeding then that is where the difficulties arise!
I'd say go ahead and show him. If there are problems as Dawn said transfer him into your name. Then even the breeding restrictions can be lifted as there is no contract in force between you and the breeder!
Becky
He won't be used for breeding tbh, my parents just wanted a pet I'll only show him here and there nothing major. It's just nice for me to keep my hand in with Spaniels and also nice for Rossi to get out and about (he adores everyone!). That's why I can't understand the breeders problem, we really won't be any competition at all!
Originally Posted by
Shona
get him in the ring, give him a go and see what the judges think,
im assuming he was the same price as the show pups,
have fun with him, I think the breeder,,,,,,well reeks of breeder
so many are so competitive, its mental, I wouldnt give a hoot, if its my breeding in a loving home beating me in the ring, good enough, I would be proud of it
Yes he was the same price, I think they're just cutting off their noses to spite their face tbh.
I can't stand all the competitiveness and the whole "show quality" thing. Surely every dog should be a pet first and fore most and anything else is a bonus!
Originally Posted by
Muddiwarx
Does he have a poor bite or anything that would make him unsuitable for showing? He looks nice to me but I don't know the breed ... is just seems nonsensical so am wondering if there is something else going on?
Nothing wrong with his bite that I know of, but then I do try and keep my hands out of his mouth at the moment!
I'll see what they say at Ringcraft on Wednesday, they'll let me know if he has anything major wrong with him.
Originally Posted by
Sal
I see no reason for this at all,I would be as proud as punch if a puppy I bred was been shown.
I think what Dawn said could be the truth.
Becky the KC will uphold endorsements if they are placed correctly by the breeder even if the dog changes hands,
http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=784
If an endorsement is correctly placed, the KC will not lift it without the specific permission of the breeder – even if the dog changes hands again.
Just looked at that, I'm thinking it doesn't apply in this case as they're talking about endorsements on the KC registration as opposed to endorsements on the pup itself?
Originally Posted by
morganstar
Was just going to say that lol.
My contract also states the puppy is not to be sold on and I fill in the names and addresses bit on the back before I sign it.
Tbh I'm not suprised about the not to be bred from clause all my pups go with this and the dog owners are told it will not be lifted under any circumstance, but I am suprised about not been allowed to show.
Who did you buy him off do they show (you can pm me
)
I say go for it, he looks nice and as long as he's confident dont see what there problem is.
I think I've keep the wrong puppy out of the last litter she has a level bite which were hoping changes when the permenant teeth come through, the 2nd pick is hopefully going in the ring anyway as is the pick of the dogs.
He was bred by Eastriding, his Dam is a very nice dog and one of my personal favourites.
I'll have a go with him, thinking about taking him to Manchester, but he'll literally be 6 months and 6 days!