Why I don't Smack
Spurred on by GSDLOvers really well written and interesting blog about smacking, I decided to put some of my own thoughts on the subject, down on ...well, my keyboard!
I am totally anti smacking. I have never and will never raise a finger to my child (or my dogs).
Why?
First of all, my own life experience.
I was smacked as a child and I remember one incident clearly. I was smacked for arguing back about something, I knew I was right, but I had to back down because I was smacked. I remember thinking 'this proves nothing, other than that you are bigger than me and you are therefore able to get me to shut up. It doesn't mean you are right.' I swore, at that moment, that because of that I would never raise a finger to any future child of mine.
I grew up in the 70's, a time when most people were smacked and it was readily accepted as the 'norm'. When I went into 6th form, I met my head of 6th form and his sons, who explained, in his welcome talk, that his sons had never once been smacked. The two of them were and are fantastic gentle blokes, who have done incredibly well for themselves (and now, their families). I was astounded. I had always been told that children needed to be smacked to be taught wrong from right. If they weren't smacked, they went off the rails. Here, standing in front of me, was proof that was as far from being the truth as it is possible to be. That made my decision not to ever smack, even stronger.
I have worked in an incredible number of child care environments. Residential social work, education, youth work for save the children....I have done vast numbers of training courses and led many of them too, everything I have seen,confirms my belief that smacking a child is wrong.
Children need to be loved. They need to know that they are loved and repected and that they will be listened to. Yes, they need to be aware of their boundaries, a child who is not aware of their boundaries, behaviour wise, is generally a very unhappy one, but those boundaries need to be fair and they need to be consistent.
If you hit a child (and that is what smacking is, lets not pretend otherwise please...it is not a smack or a tap, it is a nice way of saying hit), if you do that, because they are, in your eyes, doing something wrong, then why are they not able to do the same to you, if you are doing something wrong in their eyes? The boundaries there are not clear, there is very much one rule for one and another rule for another. You are able to hit them if they upset you, but they cannot hit their friend in a similar situation. It is a conflicting message that is being sent out.
We all know that children copy what they see, so if they are smacked, why would they not copy that behaviour? They do. I've seen it. (A lot of what I've seen can't be repeated on here, but rest assured it ain't nice what kids do copy.) Children in play, smacking toys (or friends) for being naughty. Is that really what we want as a society?
My son knows that he is totally safe with us and that we will not ever raise a finger to him. He also knows that we would not ever expect him to raise a finger to anyone else. He understands that and he understands why. He is appalled that anyone would ever think of smacking their child.
I know this blog will upset some people who do smack, I am just trying (probably not very well) to explain why I am so anti smacking, I didn't think I should do it at the end of GSDLOvers blog as thats not fair! I am totally anti smacking and I have seen nothing, in my many years of childcare experience, to make me think otherwise, only many things that to me, confirm my point of view.